Skip to content
Independent · Editor-tested · No paid placementsAboutGLOW StandardSubscribe
GLOW
Investigation · SPF Testing · 2026

Which Sunscreens Passed (and Failed) Australia's 2026 SPF Tests

When consumer group CHOICE independently tested 20 popular SPF50/50+ sunscreens in 2025, 16 fell short of their labelled SPF - one measured SPF 4. Four met their claim. Below: the pass/fail list, what a “fail” really means, and how to choose one you can trust. GLOW didn't run these tests - we report CHOICE's and the TGA's published results, linked at the end.

16of 20 popular sunscreens fell shortof their labelled SPF.Fell short of label · 16Met SPF claim · 4Source: CHOICE, June 2025
Met their claim

The sunscreens that passed.

Four of the twenty matched or beat their labelled SPF in CHOICE's independent testing. If you want a tested-and-confirmed pick, start here.

1SPF 72
La Roche-Posay

Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen SPF 50+

Tested at ~SPF 72 by CHOICE - comfortably above its labelled 50+.

Met its SPF claim
2SPF 56
Neutrogena

Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50

Met its SPF 50 claim, measuring ~56 in independent testing.

Met its SPF claim
3SPF 52
Cancer Council

Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+

Held up at ~SPF 52 - one of only four to meet its claim.

Met its SPF claim
4SPF 51
Mecca Cosmetica

To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen

Matched its label at ~SPF 51 in CHOICE's testing.

Met its SPF claim
Fell short in testing

The sunscreens that fell short.

These returned a lower SPF than their label in CHOICE's 2025 testing. A “fail” means under-labelled, not unsafe - and where a brand has contested or retested, we note it.

Biggest discrepancy

Ultra Violette - Lean Screen SPF 50+

CHOICE measured ~SPF 4 (retested ~5 at a second lab). Ultra Violette contested the result, then withdrew the product from sale in August 2025.

ProductCHOICE resultBrand response
Banana Boat
Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+
~SPF 28Disputes result; says it meets TGA requirements
Banana Boat
Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+
Below labelled SPFDisputes result; stands by its testing
Bondi Sands
SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion
Below labelled SPFSays its own retest met SPF 50+
Bondi Sands
SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen
Below labelled SPFSays its own retest met SPF 50+
Cancer Council
Ultra Sunscreen SPF 50+
Below labelled SPF“Very concerned”; stands by its own results
Cancer Council
Everyday Value Sunscreen SPF 50
Below labelled SPFStands by its own results
Cancer Council
Kids Clear Zinc SPF 50+
Below labelled SPFStands by its own results
Neutrogena
Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50
Below labelled SPF-
Aldi (Ombra)
Everyday Sunscreen Lotion 50+
Below labelled SPF-
Woolworths
Everyday Tube SPF 50+
Below labelled SPF-
Coles
SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube
Below labelled SPF-
Invisible Zinc
Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50
Below labelled SPF-
Sun Bum
Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+
Below labelled SPF-
Nivea
Sun Protect & Moisture Lock SPF 50+
Below labelled SPF-
Nivea
Sun Kids Ultra Protect & Play Lotion SPF 50+
Below labelled SPF-

Source: CHOICE, June 2025. Results attributed to CHOICE; brand responses summarised from public statements. Specific figures shown only where a measured value was reported.

How SPF is tested.

SPF isn't read off a machine - it's measured on people, which is partly why two labs can disagree.

In-vivo · on real skin10+ volunteers;UV measured onprotected skinThe global standard. Accurate but slow, costly, variable.In-vitro · on a lab plateNo skin - UVthrough a filmon a plateFaster & cheaper. The TGA is reviewing it as an option.

What a “fail” actually means.

A failed product is not dangerous - it just delivers less than the number on the front. Even an under-performer blocks most UV; the gap adds up over a long Australian day.

How much UVB a sunscreen blocksSPF 5098%SPF 3096.7%SPF 2095%SPF 475%Even an under-performer blocks most UV - but at SPF 4, up to five times more UV reaches your skin than the label implies.
If you bought one

What to do now.

  • Keep using sun protection - stopping is far riskier than a lower-than-labelled SPF.
  • Apply more, reapply often. Use 7 teaspoons for the body and top up every 2 hours.
  • Layer up: hat, shade, sunglasses and clothing do what sunscreen alone can't.
  • Follow the UV3+ rule: whenever the UV index hits 3 or above, protection is worth it.
  • Prefer certainty? The four products above met their claim in independent testing.
Frequently asked

Common questions.

Are the sunscreens that failed the SPF test dangerous?

No - a ‘fail’ means a product delivered lower SPF than its label says, not that it's harmful. You're still protected, just less than the number suggests, so reapply more often and don't rely on one thin layer.

Which sunscreen brands passed Australia's SPF test?

In CHOICE's 2025 testing, four met or beat their labelled SPF: La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin SPF 50+, Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50, Cancer Council Kids SPF 50+ and Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+.

Can I trust SPF 50+ labels in Australia?

Most do, but independent 2025 testing showed several popular ones under-delivered - and some brands dispute those results. Until the TGA's review concludes, apply generously and reapply every two hours.

Did GLOW run these SPF tests?

No. SPF testing requires accredited labs and human-panel trials. This reports the results published by CHOICE (June 2025) and the TGA's response, linked below.

Sources & method

Where this comes from.

GLOW did not conduct SPF testing. This reports independently published results and regulatory guidance:

General information, not medical advice. SPF results vary between labs and several findings are contested; the TGA's review is ongoing. Do not stop using sun protection. Related: best SPF for oily skin · all skincare guides.